EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 4 PM ET, April 01, 2015
Study: Neurologists鈥 Focus on Face-to-Face Time with Patients Undervalued by Medicare
MINNEAPOLIS -
Most neurologists provide face-to-face care of neurology patients, many of whom have complex condition such as Alzheimer鈥檚 disease, epilepsy and Parksinson鈥檚 disease 鈥 diseases that require extensive evaluation and management. However, a new study published in the April 1, 2015, issue of , the medical journal of the , finds face-to-face care by neurologists is severely undervalued by Medicare and reimbursed at a substantially lower rate than what Medicare pays doctors for performing tests and procedures. 鈥淪pending time understanding patient鈥檚 symptoms and performing a detailed examination are the critical aspect of neurology 鈥 nothing else is more important,鈥 states study author Kevin A. Kerber, MD, of the University of Michigan Health System and a member of the 好色先生. 鈥淭here are new policies that incentivize this work for physicians, but these policies specifically exclude neurologists 鈥 which could be a big missed opportunity to improve neurologic care in the United States.鈥 The study reviewed all Medicare payments to neurologists in 2012 based on physician payment data that was released publicly for the first time in April 2014. The study found that 60 percent of Medicare payments to neurologists was for evaluation and management (E/M) services. Evaluation and management services are used in diagnosing complex conditions, selecting appropriate tests and treatments, and following up with patients with chronic conditions. E/M services are generally not reimbursed as highly as procedural services, which include performing or interpreting tests or conducting procedures, such as taking a biopsy. 鈥淲e wanted to use this Medicare data to assess whether neurologists should be considered E/M-based doctors or procedure-based doctors. These data were very clear that neurologists are E/M-based providers 鈥 which fits well with the neurology community鈥檚 longstanding emphasis on the history, talking to patients, and examination. Exactly why neurologists were not included but some other specialties were is not clear.鈥 Neurologists receive a higher proportion of their payments from E/M services than surgical specialties, which had a range of 9 percent to 51 percent of payments from E/M services, but a lower proportion than primary care providers, which had about 85 percent of payments for E/M services. 鈥淭hese data highlight the problem neurologists had with the Affordable Care Act鈥檚 Primary Care bonus, which gave a 10 percent bonus payment to physicians with E/M codes for at least 60 percent of their charges鈥攜et neurologists were not included in this program,鈥 said Neil A. Busis, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, who wrote a corresponding editorial and who is a Fellow of the 好色先生. 鈥淭wo-thirds of neurologists met this threshold in 2012, and would have been included if the policy incentivized physicians by what services they provide rather than by their specialty.鈥 鈥淭he new policies mean that a provider who refers their patient to a neurologist for their expertise could receive a higher payment for the service than the neurologist 鈥 even if the neurologist takes more time on the history and examination, and improves the patient鈥檚 symptoms鈥, said Kerber. 鈥淚鈥檓 not sure we want these imbalances in payments per service.鈥 Kerber noted that a previous study showed that the demand for neurologists is growing as an aging population increases the rate of diseases such as dementia and stroke. 鈥淓stimates suggest that the US could use 11 percent more neurologists right now, and that shortfall is projected to grow to 19 percent by 2025,鈥 Kerber said. The current study found that the median neurologist received nearly 75 percent of Medicare payments from E/M services. More than 20 percent of neurologists received all of their Medicare payments from E/M services. Neurologists made up 1.5 percent of all providers, and received 1.8 percent of all payments. An AAN employee was a co-author on the study, but the study was not sponsored by the AAN. Neil A. Busis, the editorial author, is a member of the AAN Board of Directors. To learn more about brain health, please visit