好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

The Economic Impact of Glioma Survivorship: Unraveling the Cost of Care from a Patient Perspective
Neuro-oncology
S14 - Neuro-oncology (2:12 PM-2:24 PM)
007

To characterize the socioeconomic impact of glioma patients who had completed treatment, and were stable, using the standardized Medical Expenditure Panel Survey – Household Component (MEPS-HC).

Gliomas are rare but exhibit disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality than other cancers.  CNS tumors have the highest initial per-patient cost of any malignancy. Direct medical costs from a payer perspective have been described, but there is a paucity of data reflecting patient perspectives and long-term financial implications of glioma survivorship.

The MEPS-HC questionnaire was utilized to investigate the degree of economic hardship related to the patient’s brain tumor, its treatment, and the lasting effects of the disease/treatment on patients and their caregivers. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize variables and between-group comparisons were evaluated using a Fisher’s exact test.

89 out of 107 survivors completed the survey (response rate = 85%, female =52%, 40% high grade, 60% low grade). Patients with a gross-total resection (GTR) at initial surgery were less likely to report ongoing limitations in daily activities (45% v. 83%, p=0.004). Financial burden and workforce morbidity were insensitive to tumor location, laterality, and household income. The majority of survivors were insured at the time of diagnosis (91%), married (76%), and employed (79%) with household incomes reflecting the national average. 24% incurred debt referable to brain tumor care, 53% required extended unpaid time off, 46% retired or were no longer working. Direct, non-medical costs were driven by transportation (49%) and lodging (19%). 

Stable glioma survivors that are not on active treatment continue to be significantly impacted by direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs associated with their brain tumor and concomitant treatment.  Financial burden and workforce morbidity was ubiquitous across all tumor subtypes, treatment paradigms, and income levels. Those with GTR were less likely to report ongoing limitations.

Authors/Disclosures
Tobias Walbert, MD, PhD, FAAN (Henry Ford Hospital Detroit)
PRESENTER
Dr. Walbert has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Dr. Walbert has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Orbus Therapeutics. Dr. Walbert has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novocure. Dr. Walbert has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for AnHeart.
James Snyder, DO The institution of Dr. Snyder has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche Diagnostics. The institution of Dr. Snyder has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Premier Applied Sciences. The institution of Dr. Snyder has received research support from Vizilitics inc.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Lonni Schultz, PhD (Henry Ford Hospital) Dr. Schultz has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file