好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

MR Elastography (MRE) for the Differentiation of Intracranial Tumors - Results of a Histology Correlated Study
Neuro-oncology
P07 - (-)
010
BACKGROUND: The non-invasive differentiation of brain tumors has remained dissatisfying, the majority of neurooncology patients still need to undergo brain biopsy in order to make a diagnosis.
DESIGN/METHODS: Sixteen patients with suspected intracranial malignoma and planned biopsy / surgery were selected from neuroradiological routine. MR elastography was performed on an 3 Tesla MRI scanner (Philips Achieva), applying motion encoding EPI sequences in three directions and monofrequent shear wave generation by a head cradle as previously described. Viscoelasticity was measured for tumor tissue as well as for healthy white matter as reference tissue.
RESULTS: The study population comprised of n=16 intracranial tumors, among these meningeomas (n=2), solitary metastasis (n=3), as well as WHO grade II - IV tumors (n=10). Compared to reference tissue, meningeomas were obvious more firm. Metastases were either slightly firmer or softer than reference tissue. WHO grade II and III tumors (n=6) were obvious softer than white matter in all cases. The softest tissue parameters were represented by WHO grade IV tumors. Viscoelasticity parameters were supplemented by an extensive histopathology work-up. High WHO grade tumors were significantly softer than tumors of lower staging, the range of metastatic viscoelasticity was slightly higher compared to primary brain tumors. MRE was well-tolerated by all patients and is feasible for clinical routine application.
CONCLUSIONS: MR elastography of cerebral tumors at 3 Tesla reliably quantifies tumor tissue firmness for preoperative planning. According to our histology correlated preliminary results, tumor viscoelasticity may be an additional diagnostic parameter for non-invasive tumor differentiation by MRI.
Authors/Disclosures

PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Jens Wuerfel, MD (Hoffmann-LaRoche) Dr. Wuerfel has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of MIAC AG. The institution of Dr. Wuerfel has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Actelion. The institution of Dr. Wuerfel has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. The institution of Dr. Wuerfel has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche.
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, MD (Department of Neurology, University At Buffalo) Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genentech. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis . Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Serono. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genzyme &Sanofi. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Janssen . Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Bayer. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Horizon. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Genentech. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Janssen. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Reviewer with NIH.