好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Development of Portable Pupillometer for Assessment of Neurological Disease
Neuro-ophthalmology/Neuro-otology
P1 - Poster Session 1 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
4-001
To configure and validate a portable quantitative pupillometer.

The pupillary light reflex is an important component of the neurological exam. Quantitative pupillometry may offer advantages over the qualitative clinical exam. Commercially available devices are cumbersome, require operator expertise, or are not customizable.

Light stimulation and pupil recording protocols based on Park et al.(IOVS 2011;52(9):6624-35) were implemented using the retEVAL device(LKC Technologies Inc) using the Lua programming language. Dark adaptation(DA), duration and intensity of blue light flashes were manipulated. Full protocols were completed in 1 eye of 2 control subjects. Response to a 1 sec bright blue(316.2 cd/m2) flash following 3 min of DA was recorded in both eyes of a control subject and a subject with unilateral chronic optic neuropathy with clinically detectable relative afferent pupillary defect on clinical exam. Maximum pupillary constriction(1s after stimulus onset) and the post illumination pupillary response(PIPR,6-8s after stimulus onset) were extracted.

For control subjects the pupil response curves for different intensities and duration of blue light stimuli were similar to those reported by Park et al. Curves for 3 min dark adaptation were similar to 10 min dark adaptation. In the control subject maximum constriction PIPR were 65.5%, 47.1% in the left eye and 69%, 31.1% in the right eye following a bright blue stimulus. For the unilateral optic neuropathy subject these values were 52.2%, 16% in the unaffected eye and 29.3%, 8.6% in the affected eye.

The portable pupillometer demonstrated pupillary dose response to stimulus duration and intensity. It recorded both maximum and post illumination pupillary responses to a 1s bright blue stimulus to be reduced in an eye with optic neuropathy compared with the fellow eye. The intereye difference for maximum constriction was larger in the optic neuropathy subject than the control subject. These results provide initial validation for our portable pupilometer.

Authors/Disclosures
Heather Moss, MD, PhD, FAAN (Spencer Center for Vision Research at Stanford)
PRESENTER
Dr. Moss has received personal compensation in the range of $100,000-$499,999 for serving as a Consultant for Verana Health. Dr. Moss has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Legal Firms. The institution of Dr. Moss has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Moss has received research support from Research to Prevent Blindness. Dr. Moss has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. Dr. Moss has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a grant review panel with National Institutes of Health. Dr. Moss has a non-compensated relationship as a Board of Directors with North American Neuro-ophthalmology Society that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.
No disclosure on file