好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Impact of Fremanezumab on Response Rates, Acute Medication Use, and Disability in Patients With Episodic Migraine Who Have Failed at Least One Prior Migraine Preventive Medication
Headache
P2 - Poster Session 2 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
13-001
To assess the effects of fremanezumab on response rates, acute headache medication use, and disability in episodic migraine (EM) patients who failed at least one prior preventive migraine medication.

Preventive medication is recommended for EM patients with ≥4 headache days per month. Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is efficacious in preventing EM, but its effectiveness in patients who failed previous preventive medications is unknown.

In this Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg at baseline and placebo at Weeks 4 and 8), fremanezumab monthly (225 mg at baseline, Weeks 4 and 8), or placebo (at baseline, Weeks 4 and 8). Analyses were performed in patients who failed at least one prior preventive migraine medication (due to lack of efficacy or intolerability). Endpoints included the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in the monthly average number of migraine days, mean change from baseline in the monthly average number of days of acute headache medication use or the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score during the 12-week treatment period.

A greater proportion of patients who received fremanezumab had a ≥50% reduction in migraine days (quarterly: 38%, P=0.0115; monthly: 42%, P=0.0015) compared with placebo (18%). Fremanezumab significantly reduced the days of any acute headache medication use (quarterly [least-squares mean change]: –3.1 days; monthly: –3.4 days) compared with placebo (–1.1 days; both, P<0.0001). Fremanezumab significantly improved disability, based on the change in MIDAS score (quarterly: –24.7, P=0.0006; monthly: –27.0, P<0.0001) compared with placebo (–11.3).  
 Among EM patients with prior preventive migraine medication failure, fremanezumab was efficacious, reduced acute headache medication use, and improved disability, with effect sizes greater than those in the overall trial population.
Authors/Disclosures
Paul Winner, DO, FAAN (Palm Beach Headache Ctr)
PRESENTER
Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Teva. Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Allergan. Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lundbeck . Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Amgen. Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Allergan. Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Lundbeck. Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva. Dr. Winner has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for lilly. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Amgen. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Allergan. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Lundbeck . The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Lilly. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Teva. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Supernus. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from Avinar. The institution of Dr. Winner has received research support from SAMUS.
Rashmi B. Halker Singh, MD, FAAN (Mayo Clinic) Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Pfizer. Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for AbbVie. Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Lundbeck. Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Current Neurology & Neuroscience Reports. Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Headache Journal. Dr. Halker Singh has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a CME speaker with Pri-med. Dr. Halker Singh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a CME speaker with Medscape.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Paul P. Yeung, MD, PhD No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file