好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Coexisting Anti-Ma and Anti-NMDA-R Antibody Syndromes in a Case of Brainstem and Limbic Encephalitis
Autoimmune Neurology
P2 - Poster Session 2 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
15-013

To present a patient demonstrating clinical and radiologic evidence of brainstem and limbic encephalitis with multiple neuronal autoantibodies

Brainstem, diencephalic, and/or limbic encephalitis is characteristic of anti-Ma1/Ma2 antibody-mediated encephalitis, while brainstem involvement is atypical for anti-NMDA-R encephalitis.  Although coexisting autoantibody syndromes are rare, a systematic diagnostic approach with autoantibody testing and malignancy screening is essential in suspected autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis.

Case report and literature review
A 66-year-old male smoker presented with subacute decline in cognition, balance, and diplopia. His neurologic exam and neuroimaging showed evidence of a brainstem and limbic encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) demonstrated a lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, and five unique oligoclonal bands. In the CSF, anti-Ma1/Ma2 and anti-NMDA-R antibodies were positive, while serum anti-GAD65 antibodies were low-positive (0.12 nmol/L, ref <0.02). Chest CT showed extensive pulmonary fibrosis and multiple spiculated pulmonary nodules, with high suspicion for lung carcinoma. Lymph node biopsy was non-diagnostic, but his worsening pulmonary status prevented further evaluation and ultimately he transitioned to hospice care.

His presentation is most consistent with anti-Ma1/Ma2 mediated encephalitis, with coexisting CSF anti-NMDA-R antibodies producing an overlapping clinical syndrome, likely in response to a lung neoplasm. Initial diagnostic testing for suspected autoimmune encephalitis should include a panel of autoantibodies, as there can be significant overlap in clinical symptoms associated with each neural autoantibody. Individual antibody testing should be informed by the clinical presentation. Anti-Ma1/Ma2 antibodies are not part of standard autoimmune panels but were tested in this scenario, in addition to a standard panel, given the pattern of encephalitis and neoplastic risk factors. A broader autoantibody evaluation is required if a mismatch occurs between clinical features and discovered antibodies, or else the diagnosis may be missed. In the setting of multiple autoantibodies, a careful evaluation for malignancy or systemic autoimmunity is warranted, with malignancy screening informed by the antibodies present.

Authors/Disclosures
Ryan Kammeyer, MD (Childrens Hospital Colorado)
PRESENTER
The institution of Dr. Kammeyer has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Amgen. The institution of Dr. Kammeyer has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Dr. Kammeyer has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Ogborn-Mihm Trial Lawyers. The institution of Dr. Kammeyer has received research support from Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center.
Amanda L. Piquet, MD, FAAN (University of Colorado) The institution of Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genentech/Roche. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Alexion. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Kyverna . The institution of Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Genentech/Roche. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Kyverna. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Sands Anderson PC. Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Joe Jones Law Firm. Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Cortez & Associates. Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Falk Waas. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from Rocky Mountain MS Center. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from Roche/Genentech. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from NYU. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from Anokion. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from UCB . The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from Foundation for Sarcoidosis. The institution of Dr. Piquet has received research support from Kyverna . Dr. Piquet has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Piquet has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Piquet has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Litigative Consultant with US-Dept HHS/DICP. Dr. Piquet has a non-compensated relationship as a Medical Advisory Board Member with Autoimmune Encephalitis Alliance (AEA) that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Piquet has a non-compensated relationship as a Medical Advisory Board Member with Stiff Person Syndrome Research Foundation (SPSRF) that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.