好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Validation of the Scoring Algorithm for a Novel Integrative Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) Screening Tool
Multiple Sclerosis
P3 - Poster Session 3 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
15-011

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) screening tool to support the diagnosis of patients with SPMS in clinical practice

Timely diagnosis of SPMS represents a challenge for clinicians in daily practice. The SPMS screening tool was developed to support early identification of patients who have progressed, or are at risk of progressing, from relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to SPMS. A mixed methods approach involving qualitative research with patients and clinicians and regression on data from a large real-world observational study (n=2,791) was used to determine tool content and create the scoring algorithm

MS neurologists in the United States, Canada, and Germany completed the digital tool for up to 10 patients each, for patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, SPMS and those where the clinician suspected transition to SPMS. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the tool and define the score thresholds that optimally discriminate between RRMS and SPMS diagnoses

20 neurologists completed the tool for 198 patients. Mean scores for patients with SPMS, suspected to be progressing SPMS, RRMS were (69.6 vs 55.2 vs 38.1, p<0.001) respectively. A threshold of ≥58.85 identified patients with SPMS with sensitivity=0.82, specificity=0.84, area under the ROC curve [AUC]=0.904 [95% confidence interval 0.86–0.95]. A threshold of ≤51.80 identified patients with RRMS with sensitivity=0.83, specificity=0.82, while a threshold of ≤53.85 had sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.76 using the sum of squares and Youden’s J index, respectively (AUC=0.908 [0.87–0.95])

These results demonstrate that the SPMS screening tool was able to differentiate between RRMS and SPMS patients with high sensitivity and specificity and thus also identify patients in transition. These findings support the validity and potential clinical utility of the tool to help recognize early signs suggestive of progressive disease

Authors/Disclosures
Tjalf Ziemssen, MD, FAAN (University Clinic Dresden)
PRESENTER
Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS . Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Roche. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for TEVA. Dr. Ziemssen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for Dresden Internation University. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Merck. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Sanofi. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from BMS. The institution of Dr. Ziemssen has received research support from Roche.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Andrew Trigg Andrew Trigg has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Adelphi Values.
Frank Dahlke, MD, PhD Dr. Dahlke has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Novartis.
Davorka Tomic Davorka Tomic has stock in Meck KGaA.
No disclosure on file
Mark S. Freedman, MD, FAAN (University of Ottawa) Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Actelion(Janssen/J&J). Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Alexion. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BiogenIdec. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS/Celgene. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Inc. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Actelion (Janssen/J&J). Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alexion. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Atara Biotherapeutics. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Bayer Healthcare. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for BiogenIdec. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Clene Nanomedicine. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for GRI Bio. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Magenta Therapeutics. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Merck Serono. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi Genzyme. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi Genzyme. Dr. Freedman has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for EMD Serono. The institution of Dr. Freedman has received research support from Sanofi Genzyme.