好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

FLOODLIGHT: Smartphone-Based Self-Monitoring Is Accepted by Patients and Provides Meaningful, Continuous Digital Outcomes Augmenting Conventional In-Clinic Multiple Sclerosis Measures
Multiple Sclerosis
P3 - Poster Session 3 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
15-024

To report an analysis of adherence, results from a patient satisfaction questionnaire, and correlations between in-clinic tests and FLOODLIGHT (NCT02952911) measures.

Sensor-based, active and passive self-monitoring may be more sensitive and specific than periodic in-clinic assessments to measure progression in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Patients with MS (20–57 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0–5.5; n=76) and healthy controls (n=25) received a preconfigured smartphone and smartwatch that prompts the user to perform the FLOODLIGHT test battery, comprising ‘active tests’ and ‘passive monitoring’, for 24 weeks. The primary analysis assessed participants’ adherence (proportion of study weeks with at least 3 days of completed active testing and at least 4 hours/day of passive monitoring) and patient satisfaction with the FLOODLIGHT monitoring solution. In-clinic tests and brain MRI assessments were performed. Secondary analyses explored whether FLOODLIGHT sensor-based outcomes 1) differed between patients with MS and healthy controls and 2) correlated with in-clinic outcomes. The correlation between FLOODLIGHT sensor-based outcomes and in-clinic tests was reported using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (SCC).

The analysis of adherence of patients who completed the study showed 69.5% adherence to active tests and 78.7% to passive monitoring. Satisfaction among patients with MS who completed the study (n=68) was good-to-excellent (72.7 average score out of a possible 100 at termination visit). Correlation between the Turning speed measured with the FLOODLIGHT Five-U-Turn Test vs Timed 25-Foot Walk test time was SCC=–0.501 (p<0.001, n=60). Further comparisons between baseline FLOODLIGHT sensor-based and in-clinic testing MS outcomes will be presented.

Patients’ adherence and satisfaction combined with correlations observed between clinical and sensor-based outcomes show promising potential for the FLOODLIGHT monitoring solution to capture meaningfully relevant outcomes augmenting the clinical picture in patients with MS.

Authors/Disclosures

PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
Patricia Mulero No disclosure on file
Luciana Soledad Midaglia Fernandez No disclosure on file
Jennifer Graves, MD, PhD (UCSD) Dr. Graves has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for TG Therapeutics. Dr. Graves has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Horizon. Dr. Graves has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for MSJ. The institution of Dr. Graves has received research support from Octave. The institution of Dr. Graves has received research support from Sanofi. The institution of Dr. Graves has received research support from EMD Serono.
Stephen L. Hauser, MD (UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences) Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for NGM Bio. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Moderna. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BD. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Pheno Therapeutics. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Nurix Therapeutics. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Gilead. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Accure. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Alector. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Hinge Therapeutics. Dr. Hauser has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an officer or member of the Board of Directors for Neurona. Dr. Hauser has a non-compensated relationship as a Clinical Trial/Primary Investigator with Roche that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Hauser has a non-compensated relationship as a Clinical Trial/Primary Investigator with Novartis that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.
Laura J. Julian, PhD (Genentech) No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Jan Schadrack, MD No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Florian Lipsmeier No disclosure on file
Corrado Bernasconi Corrado Bernasconi has received personal compensation in the range of $100,000-$499,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Corrado Bernasconi has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for GeNeuro. Corrado Bernasconi has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Santhera.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file