好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Impact Of Doing Echocardiogram (ECHO) And Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) On Length Of Stay And Hospital Charges In Sschemic Stroke Patients In United States: Analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2006-2014
Neuro Trauma, Critical Care, and Sports Neurology
P3 - Poster Session 3 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
4-013

We wanted to study the impact of doing ECHO and MRI on length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges in ischemic stroke patients from a Nationally representative database 

ECHO and brain MRI are often done as a part of work up of IS patients. Impact of doing ECHO and MRI on LOS and hospital charges in ischemic stroke patients has not been well described
IS patients from NIS database for years 2006-2014 were identified using the ICD 9 codes.  We compared LOS and hospital charges in IS patients getting ECHO only, MRI only, both ECHO and MRI, with the control group with neither ECHO nor MRI. Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) is defined as greater than 4 days of hospital stay.  In multivariate analysis PLOS was adjusted with age, gender, significant medical co-morbidities, in-hospital complications, and APRDRG_Severity.
Of 3,968,427 patients with IS, 10.1% patients got only ECHO, 4.6% got only MRI, 2.3% got both ECHO and MRI and 83.0% did not get either ECHO or MRI. In univariate analysis, the mean length of stay (p= <.0001) and mean hospital charges (p= <.0001) were significantly higher in IS patients getting ECHO only, MRI only, both ECHO and MRI, when compared to patients who did not get either ECHO or MRI. In multivariate analysis the PLOS was higher in ECHO only (OR: 1.19, CI: 1.17-1.20, p=<.0001), MRI only (OR: 1.14, CI: 1.10-1.18, p=<.0001), and both ECHO and MRI groups (OR: 1.79, CI: 1.59-2.00, p=<.0001), when compared to the control group.
LOS and hospital charges were significantly higher in IS patients getting either ECHO or MRI or both. An important question is whether those tests impact treatment or prevention strategies to justify their performance?   Further studies are needed to establish the role of echo and MRI on therapy as to justify their cost.
Authors/Disclosures
Huy Q. Nguyen, MD
PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
Mohammad Rauf A. Chaudhry, MD Dr. Chaudhry has nothing to disclose.
Harathi Bandaru, MD Dr. Bandaru has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Mohammad Ghatali, MD (Texas Tech Health Science Center) Dr. Ghatali has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Paisith Piriyawat, MD (Texas Tech University) Dr. Piriyawat has nothing to disclose.
Rakesh Khatri, MD, FAAN Dr. Khatri has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Survey consultant with Alpha insight . Dr. Khatri has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Survey consultant with Survey company .
Darine Kassar, MD Dr. Kassar has nothing to disclose.
Alberto Maud, MD (Paul L. Foster School of Medicine Texas Tech UHSC El Paso, Texas) Dr. Maud has nothing to disclose.
Gustavo J. Rodriguez, MD (Gustavo J. Rodriguez) Dr. Rodriguez has nothing to disclose.
Salvador Cruz-Flores, MD, FAAN (Paul L. Foster School of Medicine Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center) The institution of Dr. Cruz-Flores has received research support from University of Texas System.