In Hamlet, Shakespeare presents Ophelia, “divided from herself and her fair judgement”, from the grief that “springs all from her father’s death”. By rejecting Hamlet, she unkowingly sets in motion the events culminate in the death of Polonius by Hamlet’s sword; and eventually her own demise by in the “weeping brook”, while “incapable of her own distress”. As Carr predicted, “circulating neurotransmitter-like molecules” were eventually identified: anti-mGluR5; anti-Hu; anti-NMDAr; anti-SOX1 and anti-PCA2. Although in many other cases they have not been found. In almost all cases, tumour-directed therapy improves the neurologic syndrome. While reading Hamlet, we missed the association between Carr’s daughter and Ophelia: the former fights and defeats Hodgkin’s disease; the latter commits one of the most strange suicides in literature. Why did Dr. Carr associate them? “Is’t possible a young maid’s wits should be mortal as an old man’s life”; in the end, they decide to “take arms against a sea of troubles, and by opposing, end them”.