好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

New/Enlarging Lesion Count: Man versus Machine
Multiple Sclerosis
P5 - Poster Session 5 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
15-027

To assess the quality of standard clinical radiological reports in patients with MS and to compare these with a neuroradiological review, and clinically cleared automated software.

MRI scans are paramount to assess disease activity and for therapeutic decision-making in MS patients. As MS is an inflammatory disease, the follow-up of lesion load is crucial.

New and/or enlarging lesion count was assessed between baseline and one-year follow-up MRI scans of 100 MS patients (RRMS or SPSMS) originating from two centers. Assessment was done through standard Clinical Radiological (CR) reports, a structured Neuroradiologist Review (NR), local automated measurements, and central automated measurements using the CE/FDA cleared software icobrain.

 

There was a strong correlation between local and central count of new lesions (center 1: R=0.81, center 2: R=0.54, all p<0.001) and new/enlarging lesions (center 1: R=0.7, center 2: R=0.73, all p<0.001).

Both CR and NR reports indicated the same 33% of patients having new or enlarging lesions, yet incomplete separate counts. The automated measured proportion was 34% locally and 45% using icobrain. 

CR and NR specified presence of enlarging lesions in only 5% of patients, while automatic measurements detected the more likely 23% (local) and 39% (icobrain) of patients.

 

CR/NR reported presence of new/enlarging lesions agreed well with automated classification of new lesions (local: 87%, icobrain: 80%) and new/enlarging lesions (local: 88%, icobrain: 78%).

Automated measurements of new/enlarging lesion count correlated strongly with the CR reported number (icobrain: R=0.69, p<0.001, local: R=0.46, p=0.02), yet stronger so with the NR reported number (icobrain: R=0.81, p<0.001, local: R=0.38, p=0.03).

Structured radiological reporting adds to the accuracy of lesion counts over clinical radiological reporting, yet separate counting of enlarging lesions is cumbersome. Automated techniques agree well with manual counts both in terms of classification (presence/absence) as in absolute number of new/enlarging lesions.

Authors/Disclosures
Wim Van Hecke, PhD (University Hospital Brussels)
PRESENTER
Dr. Van Hecke has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of icometrix.
Annemie Ribbens Annemie Ribbens has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of icometrix. Annemie Ribbens has stock in icometrix. Annemie Ribbens has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
No disclosure on file
Robert Zivadinov, MD, PhD, FAAN (Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center) The institution of Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. The institution of Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Omnicuris. The institution of Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Myrobalan. Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Sanofi. Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for EMD Serono. Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb. The institution of Dr. Zivadinov has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Biogen.
No disclosure on file
Michael G. Dwyer III, MD, PhD (Buffalo Neurological Analysis Center) Dr. Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Keystone Heart, Ltd. Dr. Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Dwyer has received research support from Novartis. The institution of Dr. Dwyer has received research support from Keystone Heart, Ltd. The institution of Dr. Dwyer has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb. The institution of Dr. Dwyer has received research support from Roche.
Niels Bergsland (Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center / State University of New York At Buffalo) Prof. Bergsland has nothing to disclose.
Ellen Carl, MS (The Jacobs Neurological Institute) No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Yael Barnett, MD (Royal North Shore Hospital) No disclosure on file
Lynette Masters, MBBS (Diagnostic MRI services) No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Heidi N. Beadnall, MD (Sydney Neurology) Dr. Beadnall has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Beadnall has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Beadnall has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis. The institution of Dr. Beadnall has received research support from MSBase Foundation.