好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence
Multiple Sclerosis
P5 - Poster Session 5 (5:30 PM-6:30 PM)
15-089

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the point prevalence of sexual dysfunction (SD) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, total and stratified by gender.

Although SD is commonly observed in MS patients, it is frequently overlooked in the clinical setting. There remains limited consensus on the actual prevalence and determinants of SD in patients with MS.

Relevant literature databases were searched for studies reporting on the prevalence of SD in MS between January 1977 and January 2015. Random-effects models were used to pool reported prevalence of SD in MS. Stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to estimate differences due to study-level characteristics. Heterogeneity was assessed using DerSimonian and Laird’s Q-test and the I2-index. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess studies deemed to have low risk-of-bias (ROB) according to a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. 

6135 studies were retrieved, of which 43 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall pooled weighted prevalence of SD was 58% (6635/14538 individuals, 95% CI, 52-64%), 63% in women (95% CI, 53-74%; n=27 studies), and 62% in men (95% CI, 54-69%; n=24 studies). There was significant between-study heterogeneity (all MS: Q= 1608.63, I2 = 97.39%; women: Q= 1608.63, I2 = 97.39%; men: Q=302.34, I2 = 92.39%, p<0.01 for all). Pooled meta-regression did not indicate a significant association of SD prevalence with age, disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale), duration of disease, or proportion with relapsing-remitting disease. A sensitivity analysis including only studies deemed to have low ROB did not result in a significant difference in the pooled prevalence of SD (55%, 95% CI, 48-62%, p=0.95).

SD is highly prevalent in MS patients, across the spectrum of disease. These data highlight the need for increased recognition of SD within MS clinical practice and evidence-based approaches to address this facet of the disease.

Authors/Disclosures
David D. Kim, MD (University Hospital)
PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Courtney S. Casserly, MD, FAAN (London Health Sciences Center) Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Serono. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Soliris. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for biogen idec. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for sanofi genzyme. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for roche. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Horizon Theraputics. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for roche. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Soliris. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for novartis. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen Idec. Dr. Casserly has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for EMG Serono. The institution of Dr. Casserly has received research support from Biogen Idec. The institution of Dr. Casserly has received research support from Western Libraries. The institution of Dr. Casserly has received research support from Western University.
Isobel A. Hawes (UCSF) Ms. Hawes has nothing to disclose.
Stefan Baral No disclosure on file
Jiwon Oh, MD, FAAN (St Michael's Hospital) Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. The institution of Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen-Idec. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD-Serono. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Astra Zeneca. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen-Idec. Dr. Oh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi-Genzyme. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from Biogen-Idec. The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from Roche.