441, 171 and 676 patients received ESL, CBZ and OXC respectively. Post-matching, 163 CBZ, 379 OXC patients matched to ESL comparators remained. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, and baseline comorbidities/AED use between matched cohorts. Proportion of patients with high adherence on ESL was significantly higher than the CBZ cohort (41.1% V. 30.1%; p=0.037). The difference in proportion of patients with high adherence on ESL and OXC was numerically higher but non-significant (39.1% V. 34.8% p=0.23).