好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

New/Enlarging T2 Lesion Identification: Semi-automated vs. Human
Multiple Sclerosis
S45 - Multiple Sclerosis: Imaging (3:42 PM-3:54 PM)
002

To compare the detection of new/enlarging T2 lesions between semi-automated computer detection and human detection.

New/enlarging T2 lesions are utilized in both clinical trials and clinical practice. The results from clinical trials are assumed to apply to clinical practice, even though the detection methods in each are very different (computer semi-automated in trials vs. human reader in routine clinical practice). Little is known about how these two methods compare.

New/enlarging T2 lesion counts derived from human radiologist and semi-automated computer software (NeuroRx, Montreal, Canada) were obtained from 887 brain MRI scans from 244 subjects enrolled in the SPRINT-MS trial. A single, blinded radiologist conducted the human interpretation; semi-automated analysis was performed on registered images, using a Bayesian-driven probabilistic classification, followed by random-forest based classification, followed by human visual confirmation (Elliott et al, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2013). Spearman’s correlation and Cohen’s kappa were derived.

Of 887 evaluations, 702 had no new/enlarging lesions by either method and were subsequently ignored. Lesions were identified on 19% of scans by semi-automated analysis and 5% by the radiologist (p<0.001). From the 185 evaluations with 1 or more lesions identified by either method, the median number of lesions per scan was 2 by semi-automated and 0 by radiologist (p<0.001). The correlation between methods was low (r=0.040, p=0.60), and kappa was similarly low at -0.051 (8.11% agreement).

There is discordance between semi-automated and radiologist detection of new/enlarging T2 lesions. Semi-automated detection reported both a higher proportion of scans with new/enlarging T2 lesions and a greater number of lesions per scan. This discordance is important for clinicians to recognize when applying clinical trial data to clinical practice, which typically uses radiologist readers without the aid of automated lesion detection.

Authors/Disclosures
Alexandra J. White
PRESENTER
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Douglas L. Arnold, MD, FAAN (Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill Univ) Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Frequency Therapeutics. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merck. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Shionogi. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Xfacto communications. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Eli Lilly. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Serono. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biohaven. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Find therapeutics. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for GSK. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Idorsia. Dr. Arnold has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Kiniksa. Dr. Arnold has stock in NeuroRx.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Robert J. Fox, MD, FAAN (Cleveland Clinic) Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for AB Science. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Janssen. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biogen. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for BMS. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for EMD Serono. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genentech. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Immunic. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sanofi. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for TG Therapeutics. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Genzyme. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Siemens. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for INmune Bio. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lily. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Greenwich Biosciences. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Roche. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Biogen. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Immunic. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Janssen. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for AB Science. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sanofi. Dr. Fox has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for BMS. The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from National Institutes of Health. The institution of Dr. Fox has received research support from National MS Society. Dr. Fox has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.