好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Clinical Update For Cenobamate: Patients’ Experiences of Efficacy and Side Effects
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG)
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG) Posters (7:00 AM-5:00 PM)
116
Assess efficacy, adverse effects/medication interactions of Cenobamate in epilepsy patients.

Cenobamate is the newest AED that works by modulating GABAA receptors and reducing repetitive neuronal firing by inhibiting voltage-gated Na+ channels1. A randomized double-blind trial determined 50% responder-rate for Cenobamate of 50.4% and seizure freedom rate of 28.3%2. To avoid potential side effects, 12-week titration was recommended3.

Retrospective, non-randomized review of electronic medical records. EMR was queried for patients at Rush Medical Center who have an active Cenobamate prescription between 03/01/2020 and 09/30/2020.

58 patients were identified; 4 excluded due to age (<18). Records of 54 patients (median age 33, range 18-68) were reviewed.

At the dose of 50mg, 12.5% of patients reported seizure freedom. At 100mg, 50% of patients reported seizure freedom and 25% of patients had 50% seizure reduction. At the dose of 200mg, 33% of patients were seizure free and 81% had seizure reduction of ≥50%. 

Most common side effects were drowsiness (37%), imbalance (26%), fatigue (24%), and dizziness (20%). Two patients reported a rash (4%).

For drowsiness, the most common concurrent AEDs included Clobazam (76%), Brivaracetam (47%), CBD (41%), and Lacosamide (41%). For imbalance: Clobazam (75%), CBD (50%), Brivaracetam (42%), and Lamotrigine (33%).

Majority of patients experienced improvement in adverse effects when doses of concurrent AEDs were lowered.

There seems to be a pharmacodynamic interaction of Cenobamate with certain medications, such as Brivaracetam/Levetiracetam, which implies an interaction with a mechanism involving SV2A ligand binding and/or its physiological effects.

Cenobamate has good efficacy that begins early in titration period, with dose dependent response. Adverse effects represent Cenobamate’s pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions with other AEDs. To remedy this, it may be reasonable to proactively reduce doses of concurrent AEDs, when safe from clinical standpoint. Patients should be encouraged to take a long view of this medication given its promising efficacy.
Authors/Disclosures
Julia Bodnya, MD (University of Chicago)
PRESENTER
Dr. Bodnya has nothing to disclose.
Michael C. Smith, MD, FAAN (Rush University Medical Center) Dr. Smith has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for SK Lifesciences. Dr. Smith has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for SK Lifesciences .
Rebecca O'Dwyer, MD (Rush University Medical Center) Dr. O'Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for UCB Pharma. Dr. O'Dwyer has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for SK Life Sciences.
No disclosure on file