好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adolescents: Post Hoc Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) vs. Standard-care Medications Efficacy
Headache
P7 - Poster Session 7 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
15-001
There is an imperative unmet need for efficacious and well-tolerated acute treatments for migraine in adolescents. The current study compared the efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) to that of standard-care medications.

Migraine is a prevalent and disabling diseases, affecting approximately 9% of children and adolescents. Migraine in adolescents has been associated with missed school days, poorer performance in school, negative effect on social interactions, and negative impact on quality of life. The majority of current migraine acute treatments for adolescents are pharmacological. Yet these treatments may not always be effective, they can cause side effects, and their overuse may lead to medication overuse headache and migraine chronification. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a non-pharmacological treatment, that provides significant symptom relief with good tolerability.

Within-participant post-hoc analysis was performed on data (n=35 adolescents) from a clinical trial of REN. Efficacy was compared (Mc’Nemar’s test) between standard-care medications (run-in phase; triptans or over the counter medications, according to patient preference), and REN treatment (intervention phase) at four endpoints (two hours post-treatment): single-treatment pain freedom and pain relief, and consistency of pain freedom and pain relief (response in at least 50% of the available first four treatments).

At two hours post-treatment, pain freedom was achieved by 37.1% of the participants with REN, vs. 8.6% of the participants with medications (p=0.004). Pain relief was achieved by 71.4% with REN, vs. 57.1% with medications (p=0.225). Consistency of pain freedom was achieved by 40% with REN, vs. 8.6% with medications (p<0.001). Consistency of pain relief was achieved by 80.0% with REN, vs. 57.2% with medications (p=0.033).

REN may have higher efficacy than certain standard-care medications for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents. A larger scale, blinded, comparative effectiveness and tolerability study is needed.

Authors/Disclosures
Andrew D. Hershey, MD, PhD, FAAN, FAHS, FAAN
PRESENTER
The institution of Dr. Hershey has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Supernus. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Upsher-Smith. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Teva. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received research support from Amgen. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received research support from NIH, NINDS. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received research support from Bioahaven. The institution of Dr. Hershey has received research support from Upsher-Smith. Dr. Hershey has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.
Samantha L. Irwin, MD (Dell Children's Specialty Pavilion) Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Biohaven . Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for NeuroDiem. Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Theranica. Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Pfizer. Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merz. Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Impel. Dr. Irwin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Theranica. The institution of Dr. Irwin has received research support from Duke Clinical Research Institute. Dr. Irwin has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Roni Sharon, MD (Roni Sharon MD) Dr. Sharon has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neurolief. Dr. Sharon has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Abbvie. Dr. Sharon has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Novartis . Dr. Sharon has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Theranica . Dr. Sharon has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Lilly. Dr. Sharon has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Teva .
Jennifer W. McVige, MD, FAAN (Dent Neurological Institute) Dr. McVige has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. McVige has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for AbbVie. Dr. McVige has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for UCB. Dr. McVige has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Neurelis. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Amgen. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Eli Lily. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Biohaven/Pfizer. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Lundbeck. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Dent Family Foundation. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Abbvie. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Teva. The institution of Dr. McVige has received research support from Theranica. Dr. McVige has a non-compensated relationship as a Neurology Board with UCNS that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. McVige has a non-compensated relationship as a Board Exam Board Member with ABPN that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.