好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Diagnostic Accuracy of GCS Score compared to CRS-r for Consciousness
Neuro Trauma and Critical Care
P14 - Poster Session 14 (11:45 AM-12:45 PM)
1-005

To determine the accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) compared to the revised Coma Recovery Scale (CRS-r) at detecting the conscious state.

The CSR-r is accepted as the gold-standard to categorize disorders of consciousness however clinical scales like the GCS are more widely used. 

Trained technicians, blinded to clinical course, performed simultaneous CRS-r and GCS scores among neurologic intensive care patients. Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating curves were estimated to assess the ability for GCS to detect the conscious state. Conscious state was defined by a score of 2 on the communication or a score of 6 on the motor subscale of the CRS-r. All estimates calculated using logistic regression with variance clustered by person and optimal cut-off determined via the Liu method. Four categorizations of the GCS were validated against CRS-r: 1) total score 2) motor sub-score of six  (binary) 3) eye sub-score of ≥3 (binary) 4 ) motor sub-score of six and eye sub-score of ≥3 (binary).

511 GCS and CRS-r scores reflecting 202 patients from December  2013 through September 2021 were identified. 41(8%) of scores demonstrated the conscious state as defined CRS-r. The optimal cut-off for total GCS score (95% CI) was estimated to be 9.5(7.9-11.1), corresponding to sensitivity 90% (81 -100), specificity 88%(78 -98), and AUC 0.95(0.91-0.99). For GCS motor sub-score of six, the estimates of sensitivity were 85%(70-100), specificity 92% (87-97), AUC 0.79(0.6-0.9), and 92% correctly classified. For GCS eye sub-score ≥3, estimates of sensitivity were 95%(88-100), specificity 69%(61-76), AUC 0.65(0.57-0.73), and 71% correctly classified. For the combination of GCS motor sub-score of six and eye sub-score ≥3, estimates of sensitivity were 80%(65-96), specificity 93%(89-97), AUC 0.75(0.56-0.88) and 92% correctly classified.

A total GCS score greater than 9.5 and motor sub-score of 6 demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for conscious state.

Authors/Disclosures
Greer Waldrop, MD (UCSF)
PRESENTER
Dr. Waldrop has nothing to disclose.
Sachin Agarwal, MD, MPH (Columbia University Med Center) Dr. Agarwal has nothing to disclose.
Jerina Carmona, Other Miss Carmona has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Shivani Ghoshal, MD (Columbia University Medical Center) Dr. Ghoshal has nothing to disclose.
Soojin Park, MD Dr. Park has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Neurocritical Care. The institution of Dr. Park has received research support from National Institutes of Health.
David J. Roh, MD (Columbia University Medical Center) Dr. Roh has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Portola Pharmaceuticals.
No disclosure on file
Angela M. Velazquez, MD Dr. Velazquez has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
Jan Claassen, MD, PhD (Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons) Dr. Claassen has stock in iCE Neurosystems. The institution of Dr. Claassen has received research support from NINDS. The institution of Dr. Claassen has received research support from McDonnel Foundation. Dr. Claassen has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Claassen has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.