好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Does High Resolution Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Conduction Study Makes a Difference When Compared To Conventional Technique?
Neuromuscular and Clinical Neurophysiology (EMG)
P5 - Poster Session 5 (11:45 AM-12:45 PM)
11-004
This study compares the changes in the Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude of femoral nerve between conventional techniques and High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) guided techniques.

Electrophysiological studies of femoral nerve by conventional techniques is often suboptimal as it is a deep-seated nerve. HRUS guided femoral nerve stimulation may improve the yield.

A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary referral center enrolling healthy subjects of either sex, aged above 18 years. Anthropometric measurements (height, weight, waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference) were recorded. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as per WHO and Asia pacific (Asian population), WC categories by WHO and IDF (South Asian population), waist to hip ratio (WHR) categories based on WHO guideline. All enrolled individuals underwent femoral nerve motor conduction study bilaterally by both conventional and HRUS-assisted methods. Data was analyzed using R studio software. The t-test was used for comparative analysis. This study has the approval of Institutional Ethics Committee and informed consent was taken from all the study subjects.

A total of 336 femoral nerves from 168 healthy subjects were studied. The mean age of the study population was 45.5 years. Increase in CMAP amplitude (mV) by HRUS-assisted technique was significantly higher when compared to conventional technique in all the age groups, either gender, in all the BMI categories by WHO criteria and in all other categories by Asia-Pacific criteria (except one), and in all the WC categories in either gender by WHO criteria except in females WC <88 cm (P<0.01).  The 5th percentile of the CMAP amplitude was higher in HRUS-assisted technique than conventional methods.

HRUS assisted technique yielded higher CMAP amplitude of femoral nerve when compared to conventional technique. HRUS guided femoral conduction studies maybe a good option in clinical practice.

Authors/Disclosures
Abhinay Kumar Gattu, Jr. (CARE HOSPITALS)
PRESENTER
Mr. Gattu has nothing to disclose.
Yerasu Muralidhar Reddy, MD (Care Hospital) Dr. Muralidhar Reddy has nothing to disclose.
Shyam K. Jaiswal, MD, MBBS, DNB (CARE Institute of Medical Sciences) Dr. Jaiswal has nothing to disclose.
Lalitha Pidaparthi, DM (Care Hospital) Dr. Pidaparthi has nothing to disclose.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Jagarlapudi M. Murthy, MD, FAAN (JMK Murthy) Dr. Murthy has nothing to disclose.