好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Treatment Response in Patients with Clinical and Supportive Laboratory Features of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Without Demyelinative Findings on Nerve Conduction Studies
Neuromuscular and Clinical Neurophysiology (EMG)
P8 - Poster Session 8 (11:45 AM-12:45 PM)
11-006

To evaluate the treatment response of patients with clinical and supportive laboratory features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) who lack evidence of demyelination on nerve conduction studies (NCS).  

In clinical practice, not all patients with clinical features of CIDP meet rigorous EFNS/PNS evidence of demyelination on NCS. Patients with “supportive” evidence of CIDP on CSF, MRI, or ultrasound, but not on NCS, often receive immunosuppressive therapy, but their treatment response is unclear.  

Retrospective chart review was conducted on 232 consecutive patients seen at our center over a 20-year period who met clinical criteria for CIDP and were treated with disease-modifying immunosuppressive therapy.  Patients were selected who did not have EFNS/PNS NCS criteria of demyelination, but who did have supportive CSF, MRI, or ultrasound laboratory findings consistent with CIDP. A positive treatment response was defined as at least a 1-point improvement in the modified Rankin scale MRS, or a 4-point increase in the Medical Research Council sum score (MRCSS), as MRS and MRC data was available for all patients.

20 patients met criteria. 16/17 (94%) had CSF protein > 45 mg/dL. 6/14 (43%) had lumbar root enhancement on MRI. 4/6 (67%) had enlargement of proximal nerve segments on ultrasound. 18 patients (90%) received IVIg, 10 (50%) corticosteroids, one (5%) PLEX, and six (30%) other immunomodulatory therapies. 12 patients (60%) had a positive treatment response on the MRCSS, or MRS. The presence of lumbar root enhancement or enlarged proximal nerve segments on ultrasound predicted a positive treatment response (p<.013). Elevated CSF protein alone did not predict improvement.

A trial of immunosuppressive treatment should be considered for patients with clinical features of CIDP in the absence of NCS evidence of demyelination, particularly when there is lumbar root enhancement on MRI or enlarged proximal nerve segments on ultrasound. 
Authors/Disclosures
Patrick Curry, MD (Strong Memorial Hospital)
PRESENTER
Dr. Curry has nothing to disclose.
David N. Herrmann, MD, FAAN (University of Rochester Medical Center) Dr. Herrmann has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Acceleron. Dr. Herrmann has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Guidepoint global. Dr. Herrmann has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for GLG. Dr. Herrmann has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neurogene. Dr. Herrmann has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Sarepta. Dr. Herrmann has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Regenacy. Dr. Herrmann has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
Michael Stanton, MD, FAAN (University of Rochester Medical Center) Dr. Stanton has nothing to disclose.
Phillip C. Mongiovi, MD (U of Rochester, Dept of Neurology) Dr. Mongiovi has nothing to disclose.
Eric L. Logigian, MD, FAAN (University of Rochester Medical Center) Dr. Logigian has nothing to disclose.