From 219 enrolled patients, 66.7% (146/219) responded [74% (108/146) had both F2F and TNC]: age 40.9 (30.6-55.2) years; 63.0% (92/146) female; 2.7% (4/146) from neighboring countries; follow-up period with neurologist (DSS) 6.8 (1.5-29.8) months; and most common presentations were headache [30.8% (45/146)], seizure [26.0% (38/146)] and neurodegenerative [15.1% (22/146)] disorders. For TNC, >90%: (i) found it just as comfortable as F2F (p=0.35) and not in violation of their privacy; (ii) saved time [3.0 (2.0-4.0) hours], travel [11.0 (7.2-21.1) km] and cost [$10 (5-20)]; (iii) felt satisfied with the care and that their neurological concerns were adequately addressed; and (iv) would use TNC again. Conversely, 15.1% (22/146) did not agree with TNC being as effective as F2F, including the neurologist identifying all their health problems satisfactorily (p=0.03). In total, our TNC service saved our patients $6,125, 1,143 hours, and 25,506km of travel, equating to 3.5 tons (21 trees) of carbon dioxide emissions.