好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Do Medical Miracles Exist? A Systematic Review of Unanticipated Recovery from Coma as Portrayed in the Media
Neuro Trauma and Critical Care
P12 - Poster Session 12 (11:45 AM-12:45 PM)
7-002

We sought to assess the characterization of “miraculous” coma recovery in public media to elucidate the underlying causes and diagnostic testing.

In the last 50 years, over 10,000 media articles have been published about individuals who made “miraculous” recoveries from comatose states, with the frequency increasing over time. These articles, although sensational, are most often devoid of crucial medical details, reducing the complex conversation around coma to an overly simplistic narrative.

Using the Nexis Uni database, we conducted a review of newspapers and websites referencing “miraculous” recovery from coma between 1/1/1980 and 10/1/2024. Our inclusion criteria consisted of articles from the top 50 most-trafficked news outlets that included the words "coma," "comatose," "recovery," or "miracle."

A total of 122 distinct media articles were reviewed. The median age of patients was 26 years (IQR 16.25-40) with a median coma duration of 14 days (IQR 7-54.25); the majority were men (55.1%). Most articles (51.6%) referenced traumatic etiologies of coma, of which a third (34.9%) were medically-induced. Almost a third of the overall cohort (32.7%) referenced medically-induced comas. Objective tests such as MRI (3.27%), CT (3.27%), and EEG (2.46%) were rarely referenced. Additionally, documentation of a neurological evaluation by someone with neurological expertise occurred in less than a quarter (24.5%).

Our study highlights a growing dilemma in post-coma care. While media articles may be intended to inspire hope, they are often sensational and devoid of critical details, which can cause confusion and provide false hope for families facing critical goals-of-care conversations. Broadcasting misdiagnoses and incorrect or inadequate prognostication may foster distrust of clinicians when the chance of meaningful recovery is implausible. For healthcare providers navigating these discussions, understanding the content of these articles and educating families on the differences may alleviate ambiguity and reduce unnecessary suffering and moral distress.

Authors/Disclosures
Alexander T. Scott, Research coordinator
PRESENTER
Mr. Scott has nothing to disclose.
Rebecca Stafford (Boston Medical Center) Ms. Stafford has nothing to disclose.
Isabelle Xu, BA Miss Xu has nothing to disclose.
Ali Daneshmand, MD (Boston University School of Medicine) Dr. Daneshmand has nothing to disclose.
Brian J. Coffey, MD Dr. Coffey has nothing to disclose.
Ika Noviawaty, MD (Boston Medical Center) Dr. Noviawaty has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Jazz Pharmaceutical/CME Outfitter. The institution of Dr. Noviawaty has received research support from MARINUS. The institution of Dr. Noviawaty has received research support from UCB.
David M. Greer, MD, FAAN (Boston University School of Medicine) Dr. Greer has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Thieme, Inc. Dr. Greer has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for multiple. Dr. Greer has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Greer has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Greer has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Greer has a non-compensated relationship as a Treasurer-Elect with American Neurological Association that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Greer has a non-compensated relationship as a President with Neurocritical Care Society that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.