好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Comparison of MK-6240 and Flortaucipir Tau PET for the Biological Staging of Alzheimer Disease
Aging, Dementia, and Behavioral Neurology
P11 - Poster Session 11 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
4-004

We aim to compare the biological staging of Alzheimer Disease using two different tau PET tracers.

The Alzheimer’s Association workgroup criteria (AA-2024) suggest four biological stages based on PET imaging. However, the application of this framework may vary depending on the tau PET tracer used. Also, the distribution of clinical stages by biological stage may differ.

We stratified 182 amyloid-positive participants from the HEAD study (Head-to-Head Harmonization of Tau Tracers in Alzheimer's Disease) that underwent both [18F]MK-6240 and Flortaucipir tau PET. Four clinical stages (normal, transitional, MCI, and dementia) were defined based on the AA-2024 criteria. Within clinical stage-2 (transitional) we assessed subgroups: subjective cognitive decline (SCD), subtle objective cognitive decline (SOCD), and mild behavioral impairment (MBI). Logistic and linear models corrected by age and sex tested association of groups with amyloid and tau pathology. The biological staging was performed using tracer-specific thresholds for regional SUVR and testing three regions of interest schemes: (i)proposed by AA-2024, (ii)Braak stages, (iii)or single anatomical regions. Cohen’s weighted-kappa (K) statistic measured clinical-biological and between-tracer agreements.

Clinical stages showed progressively increased prevalence of Aβ-positivity and higher entorhinal tau PET pathology from cognitively normal (CN) to SOCD, MCI, and dementia, in both tracers. MBI and SCD groups showed no increased Aβ or tau pathology compared to CN. For this reason, only SOCD was considered part of stage 2 for following analyses. All tested biological staging strategies showed moderate agreement (Cohen's-kappa 0.34-0.59) with clinical stages for both MK-6240 and Flortaucipir.

Our results support that AA-2024 biological and clinical stages show similar clinical-biological concordance using either Flortaucipir or MK-6240, although this can vary based on biological staging method. Only SOCD among transitional stage subgroups showed higher amyloid and tau burden compared to clinical stage 1, while SCD and MBI showed similar pathologic burden to the cognitively normal group.

Authors/Disclosures
Marina Scop Medeiros, MD
PRESENTER
Dr. Scop Medeiros has nothing to disclose.
Pamela Lukasewicz Ferreira Dr. Lukasewicz Ferreira has nothing to disclose.
Bruna Bellaver, PhD Dr. Bellaver has nothing to disclose.
Emma Ruppert, MD Dr. Ruppert has nothing to disclose.
Hussein Zalzale, MD Dr. Zalzale has nothing to disclose.
Carolina Soares, PhD Dr. Soares has nothing to disclose.
Guilherme Bauer-Negrini, PhD Dr. Bauer-Negrini has nothing to disclose.
Guilherme Povala, PhD Dr. Povala has nothing to disclose.
Livia Silva do Amaral Mrs. Silva do Amaral has nothing to disclose.
Firoza Lussier, MS Ms. Lussier has nothing to disclose.
Dana L. Tudorascu, PhD Dr. Tudorascu has nothing to disclose.
Joseph C. Masdeu, MD, PhD, FAAN (Houston Methodist Neurological Institute) Dr. Masdeu has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Lilly . The institution of Dr. Masdeu has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Masdeu has received research support from Houston Methodist Foundation. The institution of Dr. Masdeu has received research support from Alector. The institution of Dr. Masdeu has received research support from Aviado-Bio. Dr. Masdeu has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Masdeu has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Masdeu has received personal compensation in the range of $100,000-$499,999 for serving as a Director, Nantz Nal Alzheimer Center with HOUSTON METHODIST NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE.
David N. Soleimani-Meigooni, MD (University of California, San Francisco) Dr. Soleimani-Meigooni has nothing to disclose.
Juan Fortea, MD, PhD (Hospital of Sant Pau) Dr. Fortea has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novartis. Dr. Fortea has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for AC Inmune. Dr. Fortea has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Roche. The institution of Dr. Fortea has received research support from NIH. Dr. Fortea has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care.
Val J. Lowe, MD (Mayo Clinic) Dr. Lowe has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for AVID Radiopharmaceutical. Dr. Lowe has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Eisai Inc. The institution of Dr. Lowe has received research support from AVID Radiopharmaceuticals.
Hwamee Oh, PhD The institution of Dr. Oh has received research support from NIH.
Belen Pascual, PhD (Houston Methodist Hospital) The institution of Prof. Pascual has received research support from NIH. The institution of Prof. Pascual has received research support from NIH.
Brian Gordon, PhD Dr. Gordon has nothing to disclose.
Pedro Rosa Neto, MD, PhD (McGIll University) Dr. Rosa Neto has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Novo Nordisk.
Lucas Porcello Schilling Dr. PORCELLO SCHILLING has nothing to disclose.
Suzanne Baker, PhD The institution of Miss Baker has received research support from National Institute of Health.
Tharick A. Pascoal, Sr., MD, PhD (University of Pittsburgh) Dr. Pascoal has nothing to disclose.