好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Gender and Health Risk Attitudes Shape Acceptance and Maximum Acceptable Risk for Deep Brain Stimulation and Focused Ultrasound in Essential Tremor
Movement Disorders
P1 - Poster Session 1 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
17-009

To examine how gender and health risk attitudes relate to maximum acceptable risk (MAR) for side effects for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and focused ultrasound (FUS) among individuals with essential tremor (ET).

Choosing between DBS and FUS requires balancing trade-offs in reversibility, uncertainty, and risks of functional loss. Understanding how gender and health attitudes influence acceptance of these procedures may clarify observed gender disparities in surgical uptake.

Ninety-one adults with ET (M_age = 71.71 ± 8.86 years; 32% women) completed the Health Risk Attitude Scale and scenario-based measures of acceptance and MAR for DBS (infection, bleeding, dysarthria) and FUS (abnormal sensation, gait disturbance) risks. Analyses examined gender differences and the predictive value of three health risk attitude domains, namely health disengagement, willingness to take health-related risks, and ambiguity tolerance, adjusting for age, disease severity, and caregiving burden.

Across risk scenarios, participants showed trend-level higher MAR for DBS than for FUS, F(1, 82) = 3.31, p = .073. Women reported significantly lower acceptance (β = -0.66, p = .003) and MAR (β = -0.34, p = .001) for FUS-related gait disturbance. Ambiguity tolerance predicted higher acceptance (β = 0.39, p < .001) and MAR (β = 0.32, p = .005) for gait disturbance, and health disengagement similarly predicted higher MAR (β = 0.21, p = .044). No significant gender/risk attitude interactions were detected, likely due to limited power in this preliminary sample.

Two complementary pathways may explain procedural acceptance in ET: one reflecting gendered sensitivity to losses in mobility, and the other reflecting individual differences in attitudes toward health-related uncertainty and engagement. Recognizing women may perceive gait-related risks as greater threats, while others differ in how they appraise uncertainty and engage with health decisions, can help clinicians tailor risk communication and potentially reduce gender disparities in the uptake of advanced therapies. 
Authors/Disclosures
Han-Yun Tseng, PhD
PRESENTER
Ms. Tseng has nothing to disclose.
Bridget Ollesch, MD (University of Colorado) Dr. Ollesch has nothing to disclose.
Drew S. Kern, MD, FAAN (University of Colorado) Dr. Kern has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Medtronic. The institution of Dr. Kern has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Boston Scientific. The institution of Dr. Kern has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. Kern has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbott. The institution of Dr. Kern has received research support from Boston Scientific. The institution of Dr. Kern has received research support from AbbVie Pharmaceticals. Dr. Kern has received research support from Medtronic.
Michelle Fullard, MD (University of Colorado Anschutz) Dr. Fullard has received research support from Davis Phinney Foundation. Dr. Fullard has received research support from Michael J. Fox Foundation. The institution of Dr. Fullard has received research support from NIH BIRCWH K12. Dr. Fullard has received research support from Lorna G. Moore Faculty Launch Fund.