好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Evaluating Human Pose Estimation Models in Hospitalized Patients
Neurohospitalist
P10 - Poster Session 10 (8:00 AM-9:00 AM)
2-012

Evaluate the performance of pose estimation models in hospitalized patients undergoing video EEG. 

Monitoring activity in patients hospitalized on neurological services can be crucial for timely detection of conditions such as falls, delirium, and epilepsy, but remains labor-intensive. Continuous video-based monitoring using pose estimation models offers a scalable alternative to optimize clinical assessments. Model performance in clinical populations, however, where variable postures and complex environments pose unique challenges, remains unexplored. 

Three state-of-the-art pre-trained human pose estimation models, YOLOv11, OpenPose, and MMPose, were evaluated in hospitalized patients undergoing video-EEG. Each model generated coordinates and confidence scores for facial and body keypoints. From each video, ten frames were randomly selected and manually annotated (17 common keypoints) as ground truth and used to define model-specific confidence thresholds. Sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and ROC curves were computed. Keypoint location accuracy was calculated using Euclidean distance between ground truth and model detections.  

We analyzed 46 videos from 24 hospitalized patients with diverse racial backgrounds. OpenPose showed the highest AUC in 52% of the cases (24/46 videos) and highest overall balanced accuracy (BA) of 72% (53% sensitivity and 89% specificity). For specific body regions, OpenPose performed better for facial detection (BA 77%, 64% sensitivity, 90% specificity) while MMPose performed better for upper body (BA 74%, 62% sensitivity and 85% specificity) and lower body detection (BA 66%, 48% sensitivity and 82% specificity). Distance errors were smaller for facial keypoints than for torso and limbs. 

State-of-the-art computer vision models face challenges when applied to clinical videos. Models were more accurate for facial keypoints, and least accurate for lower body keypoints. Enhancing automated computer vision performance for inpatients in neurological services may require custom models based on clinical datasets or development of novel, potentially combined, model approaches. 

Authors/Disclosures
Justin Min
PRESENTER
Mr. Min has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Northwestern University. Mr. Min has or had stock in Tesla.Mr. Min has received research support from Northwestern University.
Erika L. Juarez Martinez, MD, PhD Dr. Juarez Martinez has nothing to disclose.
Jeremy Eagles (Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine) No disclosure on file
Stephan Schuele, MD, FAAN (Northwestern Memorial Hospital) Dr. Schuele has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Monteris. Dr. Schuele has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Neurelis. Dr. Schuele has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for SK Life Science. Dr. Schuele has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Jazz. Dr. Schuele has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. Dr. Schuele has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Thomas Needham. Dr. Schuele has received research support from National Institute of Health.
Eyal Y. Kimchi, MD, PhD (Northwestern University) The institution of Dr. Kimchi has received research support from NIH. The institution of an immediate family member of Dr. Kimchi has received research support from NIH.