好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

A Systematic Review of Stroke Unit Interventions in Low- and Middle-income Countries
Global Health and Neuroepidemiology
P5 - Poster Session 5 (11:45 AM-12:45 PM)
20-001

Through a systematic analysis of existing practices and outcomes, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of stroke units (SUs) in improving outcomes for adults with acute stroke in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). 

Stroke is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide and a leading cause of disability. Despite significant reductions in stroke burden in high-income countries (HICs), outcomes remain disproportionately poor in LMICs. Organized inpatient stroke care delivered through SUs improves survival and functional recovery in HICs, yet their implementation in LMICs is limited.  

Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Global Health, and Global Index Medicus. Eligible studies included adults with acute stroke treated in SU settings in LMICs and reported clinical outcomes such as survival, functional independence, or complications. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in Covidence using predefined criteria. Study quality was assessed using the LEGEND critical appraisal tool. Data analysis is ongoing, with a focus on outcomes, barriers, and facilitators.  

Our search yielded 1,358 unique titles and abstracts, of which 10advanced to full-text review. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing SUs across 11 LMICs in Africa (n=4), Asia (n=17), North America (n=1), and South America (n=7)Preliminary findings from the studies suggest that SU interventions in LMICs are associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced in-hospital mortality, shorter lengths of stay, and higher rates of thrombolysis compared to general ward care. Common barriers included insufficient workforce training, lack of neuroimaging equipment, funding shortages, and limited rehabilitation access. Facilitators included structured care protocols, engagement of multidisciplinary teams, institutional policy support, and integration of SUs within existing hospital systems. 

SU care demonstrates potential for improving outcomes in LMICs, though gaps in resources and infrastructure remain. Further synthesis is underway to better characterize effectiveness and context-specific implementation challenges. 

Authors/Disclosures
Aisha Mahmood
PRESENTER
Miss Mahmood has nothing to disclose.
Mustafa Siddiqui Mr. Siddiqui has nothing to disclose.
Joel Collier, Clinical Librarian Mr. Collier has nothing to disclose.
Deanna Saylor, MD, MHS (Johns Hopkins Hospital) Dr. Saylor has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for 好色先生. The institution of Dr. Saylor has received research support from National Institutes of Health. The institution of Dr. Saylor has received research support from 好色先生. Dr. Saylor has a non-compensated relationship as a Member of multiple committees and task forces focused on improving access to MS medications to people across the world with Multiple Sclerosis International Federation that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Saylor has a non-compensated relationship as a Member of the Neurology and COVID19 committee with World Health Organization that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Saylor has a non-compensated relationship as a Member of the International Outreach Committee, Junior and Early Career Membership Committee, and 好色先生al Innovation Commitees with American Neurological Association that is relevant to AAN interests or activities.