好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Subcutaneous Levodopa-Carbidopa /Foscarbidopa-Foslevodopa Infusion for Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Movement Disorders
P6 - Poster Session 6 (5:00 PM-6:00 PM)
17-010

To determine the efficacy and safety profile of the subcutaneous infusion mode of administration compared to oral levodopa therapy in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.

Subcutaneous Levodopa-Carbidopa [SC L-C] /Foslevodopa-Foscarbidopa [FL/FC] infusion for Advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) offers an alternative to oral and invasive treatments, mitigating motor fluctuations by stabilizing levodopa plasma levels.

A systematic screening of PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases was conducted to identify Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and their open, label extensions (OLEs) /post hoc for detailed safety, durability, and clinical benefit analysis.

Two phase 3 RCTs and six additional studies (2 OLEs and four post hocs) were included. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that the SC L-C offered a statistically significant improvement over oral L-C in both "ON" time without troublesome dyskinesia (MD:+1.72 hours, +95%CI [+0.74,+2.70], p=0.0019) and "OFF" time (MD: −1.40hours, +95%CI [-2.33,-0.47], p=0.0028). Conversely, FL/FC showed a neutral effect in its comparison group (MD "ON" time without troublesome dyskinesia: +0.04 hours ,p=0.96 ; MD "OFF" time: 0.20 hours, p=0.40). 

Similar results were seen across the secondary outcome measures with the SC L-C having better improvement and quality of life (PDQ-39 : MD = -3.7 points, p<0.001) and reduced sleep disturbances (PDSS-2 MD = -3.5 points,p<0.001). While the FL/FC group showed non significant changes (p=0.52).

Long-term safety data, primarily from the OLE studies, confirmed sustained motor benefit Over three years (MD “OFF” time: -2.81 h/day). Safety synthesis highlighted Infusion Site Reactions (ISRs) as the most frequent adverse event resulting in discontinuation (10.3 -26.2%) within the first year.

The Subcutaneous mode of administration offers a superior effect compared to the oral L-C for motor control and across quality of life domains. While the subcutaneous mode provides a valuable alternative to oral therapy, further research To confirm long-term efficacy and standardize ISR management is needed.

Authors/Disclosures
Advait Teli, MBBS
PRESENTER
Dr. Teli has nothing to disclose.
Malavika Rudrakumar (St. John's medical college) Miss Rudrakumar has nothing to disclose.
Ananya Talukdar Ms. Talukdar has nothing to disclose.