好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Catch More or Call Fewer? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis comparing Viz.ai vs Rapid AI
Cerebrovascular Disease and Interventional Neurology
P6 - Poster Session 6 (5:00 PM-6:00 PM)
4-018

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of Rapid AI and Viz.ai for LVO detection.

Management of acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) is highly time-sensitive. Artificial-intelligence tools such as Rapid AI and Viz.ai are increasingly used to facilitate rapid detection and prioritization of LVO on brain CT angiography (CTA). 
A PRISMA-guided search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 28, 2025, was performed. Analyses were conducted in R (meta, metafor) using random-effects models. The primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity and specificity for LVO detection. Secondary outcomes included LVO detection rate (n/N), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and false-positive rate (FPR). 

Eighteen studies included 14,387patients, met inclusion criteria (13 Rapid AI; 5 Viz.ai). Rapid AI showed higher sensitivity (0.85; 95% CI, 0.80–0.90) and a higher detection rate (0.88; 0.75–0.95) versus Viz.ai (sensitivity 0.75; 0.66–0.83; detection rate 0.74; 0.66–0.81). Viz.ai demonstrated higher specificity (0.95; 0.92–0.98) than Rapid AI (0.87; 0.83–0.91). PPV was 0.57 (0.48–0.65) for Rapid AI and 0.65 (0.52–0.77) for Viz.ai; NPV remained high for both (Rapid AI 0.98 [0.97–0.98]; Viz.ai 0.97 [0.96–0.99]). FPR was lower for Viz.ai (0.05; 0.02–0.08) than Rapid AI (0.10; 0.05–0.19). All pooled estimates were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Rapid AI prioritized case capture (higher sensitivity/detection), whereas Viz.ai prioritized precision (higher specificity/lower FPR). Choice of tool may be tailored to institutional priorities. Centers prioritizing maximal LVO capture may favor Rapid AI, whereas those aiming to limit false alerts and downstream evaluations may prefer Viz.ai.
Authors/Disclosures
MOHAMMAD ALKHALDI, MD
PRESENTER
Dr. ALKHALDI has nothing to disclose.
Hafiz Talha Javed, MD (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences) Dr. Javed has nothing to disclose.
Sama Almasri, MBBS (UAMS) Dr. Almasri has nothing to disclose.
Divya Nayar, MD (Bowman Pointe Apartments) Dr. Nayar has nothing to disclose.
Hassan Akhtar, MBBS Mr. Akhtar has nothing to disclose.
Ali Hamdan, MBBS Dr. Hamdan has nothing to disclose.
Zainab Jamshaid Dr. Jamshaid has nothing to disclose.
Krishna Nalleballe, MD, FAAN Dr. Nalleballe has nothing to disclose.
Sanjeeva R. Onteddu, MD, FAAN (UMass Medical School) Dr. Onteddu has nothing to disclose.