好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

From Decline to Disability Reduction: Tirofiban Rescue in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Cerebrovascular Disease and Interventional Neurology
P6 - Poster Session 6 (5:00 PM-6:00 PM)
5-013
To characterize the clinical course, indications, and outcomes of consecutive AIS (and TIA) patients who received intravenous tirofiban for neurological worsening at our tertiary care centre.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with intravenous tirofiban has emerged as a rescue option for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who deteriorate despite standard therapies, particularly in settings of neurological fluctuation, infarct progression, or high risk of reocclusion. Although recent meta-analyses suggest potential benefit, clear clinical indications and patient selection remain under investigation.

We retrospectively analysed nine patients (mean age 68 years; 6 males) treated with intravenous tirofiban between April and October 2025. Detailed chart review captured demographics, stroke features, indication for tirofiban, baseline and post-infusion NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), comorbidities, imaging, and ancillary interventions.

Tirofiban was initiated primarily for:

(i)                          stuttering or fluctuating neurological deficits, 

(ii)                       post-thrombolysis deterioration,

(iii)                    progression despite optimal antiplatelet therapy, or

(iv)                     presumed high-risk thrombotic or re-occlusive lesions (notably basilar artery stenosis, large vessel occlusion, or capsular warning syndromes).

TIROFIBAN DOSE: IV 25ml bolus dose over 30 mins duration; followed by 8ml/hr for 23.5-47.5hrs duration.

A total of 9 patients were studied with median NIHSS on arrival was 5 (mean 5.9), falling to 1 (mean 1.9) after tirofiban. Eight patients (67%) had marked neurological recovery; 1 died during 6 months follow up owing to malignant brainstem infarction. No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was captured; with commendable symptomatic stabilization & all patients received standard adjunctive secondary prevention.

Intravenous tirofiban was most often employed as a rescue for stuttering symptoms, progression post-thrombolysis, or high-risk arterial lesions not eligible for thrombectomy. The majority experienced significant neurological improvement, but sample size and lack of systematized sICH monitoring are noted limitations. These real-world data complement recent literature and support ongoing trials of tirofiban rescue in carefully selected AIS populations. RCT remain essential for same.

Authors/Disclosures
Neha D. Mohite, Sr., MD
PRESENTER
Dr. Mohite has nothing to disclose.
Sankar P. Gorthi, MD, FAAN (Bharati hospital) Dr. Gorthi has nothing to disclose.
Dulari Gupta, MD, MBBS Dr. Gupta has nothing to disclose.