好色先生

好色先生

Explore the latest content from across our publications

Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Long-term Follow-up of Patients with Myelopathy: A Monocentric Experience at a Specialized Center
Autoimmune Neurology
P1 - Poster Session 1 (12:00 PM-1:00 PM)
C15 - Clinical Approach to Suspected Myelopathy (2:06 PM-2:16 PM)
1-069

Characterize functional outcomes of patients with myelopathy/myelitis after long-term clinical follow-up. 

Neuroimmunologists play a crucial role in caring for patients with non-traumatic spinal cord disease and there is a need to better understanding the long-term clinical outcomes in this population, particularly in the context of aging.  

We performed retrospective chart review of a cohort of patients followed for more than a decade at our Myelopathy and Myelitis Center, including clinical, imaging, and biomarker information, to establish markers of functional outcomes at symptom nadir, at the first visit to our center, and after >10 years of follow-up. 

We analyzed 86 patients. Mean age at myelopathy onset was 45.2+/-12.8 years, with a mean follow-up of 159.2+/-34.1 months. Half had a monophasic course, 34% were relapsing, and 16% were progressive. Over half of patients had a demyelinating etiology, and the remainder had diagnostic categories of rheumatologic (including neurosarcoidosis), infectious, vascular, structural, or idiopathic/unknown. 53% of patients were employed full-time prior to symptom onset; at last follow-up, 19% were employed and 21% were retired. The median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 2 (IQR=2-3) at nadir and 2 (IQR=1-3) at last follow-up. Data regarding bowel and bladder symptoms, weakest limb strength, and gait metrics were also obtained. 

Patients experience a variable course of recovery after myelopathy or myelitis. While many patients improve anecdotally, at a group level, they often remain with some degree of residual disability over a decade after their symptom nadir. 

Authors/Disclosures
Patricia I. Redondo
PRESENTER
Miss Redondo has nothing to disclose.
Clare M. Lambert, MD Dr. Lambert has nothing to disclose.
David Acero-Garces, MD Dr. Acero-Garces has nothing to disclose.
Asli Buyukkurt, MD Dr. Buyukkurt has nothing to disclose.
Daniela Riveros Acosta, MD Dr. Riveros Acosta has nothing to disclose.
Andrea Cepeda, MD Dr. cepeda has nothing to disclose.
Scott D. Newsome, DO, FAAN (Johns Hopkins Hospital) Dr. Newsome has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Genentech. Dr. Newsome has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Novartis. Dr. Newsome has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for TG Therapeutics. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Biogen. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Genentech/Roche. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Department of Defense. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from National MS Society. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Lundbeck. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Sanofi. The institution of Dr. Newsome has received research support from Kyverna Therapeutics. Dr. Newsome has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Lead PI for Clinical Trial with Roche.
Carlos A. Pardo-Villamizar, MD (Johns Hopkins U, Med Dept of Neurology) The institution of Dr. Pardo-Villamizar has received research support from National Institutes of Health. The institution of Dr. Pardo-Villamizar has received research support from Bart McLean Fund for Neuroimmunology Research .